On April 3rd, the Des Moines Register printed this second rebuttal by NAEF on the safety of eggs from Iowa’s caged layers.

The March 28 editorial “Iowa’s egg policy threatens the public, industry” disparages an important industry to Iowa, as well as the federal inspection process, and does a disservice to the readers of the Register. The editorial’s haranguing the 2010 salmonella outbreak associated with the DeCoster’s is not connected with the inspection process in place today. The editorial’s criticisms are leveled at the entire commercial egg industry in Iowa, when in fact the food safety complaints in the editorial center more on the backyard flocks with less than 3,000 chickens.

As of July 9, 2012, egg farmers with more than 3,000 chickens must comply with Title 21 Code of the Federal Register Part 118 “Prevention of Salmonella Enteriditis (SE) in Shell Eggs During Production, Storage and Transportation.” This includes testing for salmonella environmentally in young chickens at 14-16 weeks of age and again in adult chickens at 40-45 weeks of age. This testing is conducted in U.S. Department of Agriculture- and the Food and Drug Administration-approved laboratories using USDA- and FDA-approved salmonella isolation and identification conventional methodology or FDA-approved commercially produced SE diagnostic test kits.

Egg farmers with more than 3,000 chickens continue to comply with the FDA SE Egg Rule biosecurity requirements, which involve many critical control risk management points which can be invaluable risk management tools for other diseases such as highly pathogenic avian influenza. In 2015 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza resulted in unprecedented losses to the egg industry in Iowa. This economic threat is reason enough to postpone SE inspections.

We hope Iowa consumers understand that egg farmers and federal inspectors are intent on ensuring a safe and wholesome egg is available today in stores throughout the state.

Dear Editor,

It is disheartening to read the defamation heaped on Iowa egg farmers by the Des Moines Editorial Board in today’s edition entitled “Egg Safety Rules Full of Cracks”. 

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/editorials/2015/04/26/register-editorial-decoster-egg-safety/26386767/

It’s apparent this board wants to tighten the reins on egg farmers with additional regulations when they are already complying with the most comprehensive of food safety requirements in the history of the egg industry.  This board cites the actions of the one egg farmer and his son who were criminally prosecuted as if what they did was a common practice for all egg farmers in the state.  This is untrue.  I was there during the Congressional oversight hearings of this father and son in Washington, DC and saw the pitiful example they portrayed of farming. 

Having been on the farms of many Iowa egg farmers, I know firsthand what this board does not understand, that the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) egg safety rule [21 C.F.R. part 118 ThePrevention of Salmonella Enteritidis in Shell Eggs During Production, Storage, and Transportation] went into effect on July 9, 2010 and is now fully operational.  I was personally involved as the industry representative in providing input into this rule when FDA first proposed it during the Clinton Administration.  The rule provided guidance on recordkeeping for (1) biosecurity (2) monitoring for flies and other vectors that may spread Salmonella, and (3) acceptable manure removal.  After a lifetime in the egg industry, and after personally visiting egg farmers on six continents, I was able to see the production practices in comparison to Iowa egg farmers.  The board should boast of the egg farmers accomplishments rather than label the egg farmers as complicit with that father and son who were recently prosecuted for circumventing the rule.  FDA has detailed in the rule procedures for a clean environment for the chickens.  FDA has detailed in the rule how to monitor the environment to determine if the cleaning protocols are being followed.  The sampling and testing procedures are thoroughly recorded for federal inspector oversight of the entire farm.  The rule cites the scientific articles that substantiate the protocols established for Iowa egg farmers.  So, instead of using one farmer to discredit an entire industry, this board should investigate the accomplishments of the Iowa egg farmers and assure consumers nationwide that Iowa egg farmers today are world leaders in producing a safe and wholesome egg.

National Association of Egg Farmers Have Pressed Congress to Support the King Amendment and Defeat the Egg Bill

Members of the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate

1.Rep. Collin Peterson (MN-7) Ranking Member of the House Agriculture Committee

2.Rep. Steve King (IA-5) Chairman of the House Agriculture Subcommittee on Department Operations, Oversight and Nutrition, and author of “Protecting Interstate Commerce Act” (King Amendment)

3.Rep. Cheri Bustos (IL-17) Member of the House Agriculture Committee

4.Rep. Rodney Davis (IL-13) Member of the House Agriculture Committee

5.Rep. Danny Davis (IL-7) Supported Egg Bill as co-sponsor in previous Congress

6.Rep. Glenn Thompson (PA-5) Member of the House Agriculture Committee

7.Rep. Michele Bachmann (MN-6) Congressional Tea Party Caucus Chair

8.Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) Member of the Senate Agriculture Committee

9.Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) Senate Majority Whip

10.Senator Mark Kirk (R-IL) Member of Senate Appropriations Committee

Staff for Congressional Offices

11.Rep. Luis Guitierrez (IL-4) Member of the House Judiciary Committee

12.Rep. Adam Kinzinger (IL-16) Member of the House Appropriations Committee

13.Rep. Jeff Denham (CA-10) Member of the House Agriculture Committee. Offered amendment opposing King Amendment and co-sponsor of the Egg Bill in this Congress.

14.Rep. Kurt Shrader (OR-5) Member of the House Agriculture Committee. Offered Egg Bill in current and previous Congress.

15.Rep. Bill Enyart (IL-12) Member of the House Agriculture Committee.

16.Rep. Erik Paulsen (MN-3) Member of the House Ways and Means Committee

17.Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick (PA-8) Co-sponsor of the Egg Bill

18.Rep. Allyson Schwartz (PA-13) Co-sponsor of the Egg Bill

19.Rep. John Kline (MN-1) Co-sponsor of the Egg Bill

20.Rep. Keith Ellison (MN-5) Co-sponsor of the Egg Bill

21.Rep. Robert Brady (PA-1) Co-sponsor of the Egg Bill

22.Rep. Tim Walz (MN-1) Member of the House Agriculture Committee

23.Senator Thad Cochran (R-MS) Ranking Member of the Senate Agriculture Committee

24.Senator Al Franken (D-MN) Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee